Tag Archive: Sand

  1. Roundness, Sphericity and Microproppants

    Comments Off on Roundness, Sphericity and Microproppants

    Imagine a world where rocks are just rocks, or dirt is just dirt. Now jump forward to today where the name “biatite muscovite hornblende porphyritic granodiorite” exists. Why did the science of studying the earth get to a nomenclature. Simple answer, so two people discuss what they are observing at two different places. How did the geology get a to five-word, forty-nine letter description?

    One step in that process of classifying rocks and minerals is called Sphericity and Roundness. This helps describe the shape of gravel, sand and other aggregates.

    The purpose of using sphericity and roundness is to describe the shape in two different dimensions. Sphericity measures how close the shape of the particle is to a sphere.

    Roundness describes the edges of the particle. It is a way of distinguishing a rhombus and football, or an octagon and circle without actually counting the different sides.

    There is also a mathematical way of determining both the roundness and sphericity of an object by measuring different dimensions of the particles. Those equations can be found here.

    An easier and more commonly used method is a visual test. The Krumbein roundness and sphericity chart has been widely adopted as a visual method of determining the shape of an aggregate. That chart can be seen in Figure 1.

    Why is this so important for fracking oil and gas wells? Two reasons: Strength and permeability.

    Silica sand’s ability to withstand high compression stresses is very dependent on both its roundness and sphericity. If the sand is low on the sphericity and roundness chart, this particle will have a lot of sharp edges. If the compression force is directly applied to an edge, the stress concentrations increase exponentially. When stress gets too high, the sand crushes like a glass bottle under a steam roller. When the sand shatters, it increases the amount of particles that are jagged and not round. A domino effect of sand breaking and crushing happens until the only thing that is left, is a vain of silica dust deep under the earth’s crust.

    If the purpose of the silica is to hold open or prop open the cracks in the shale, does it matter if the silica is dust?

    The first purpose of a proppant is to prop open the cracks in the shale. However, there is a more important property of the sand; to allow the oil and gas to flow back to the well head. To do that, there needs to be gaps between each grain of sand to allow for the fluid to flow back to the opening.

    Imagine stacking basketballs in the shape of a pyramid. You will notice a significant gap between each ball. Instead of basketballs, imagine stacking Lego blocks in that same shape. There would be no gaps between the Legos. The same thing happens with sand, but at a much smaller scale.

    As discussed in the article entitled API Testing Standards and Microproppants, sand particles smaller than US Sieve size 140 mesh are referred to as “microproppants”. There are silica products smaller than 140 mesh, but the silica is “ground” or “milled” in most instances. These ground silica products are referred to as “silica flour” and can be found in 200 and 325 mesh sizes.  But is this what is needed?

    Silica flour is made by crushing silica sand to a dust. The particle shapes of silica flour is very low on both sphericity and roundness chart. The particles are flat and jagged, just like broken glass. If silica flour was used in a well, it would have a extremely low crush strength. More importantly, it would have almost no permeability. The oil and gas would not be able to flow to the well head.

    When looking for a microproppant, the silica sand needs to be a whole-grain silica. Below is a picture of a 200 mesh whole-grain silica. The dark column is a 0.7mm pencil lead for size reference.

    Whole-grain microproppants have roundness and sphericity and therefore have a higher crush resistance than ground silica flour.  this adds to the productivity and the life of the well.

  2. MS Industries Provides a New Source for Microproppants

    Comments Off on MS Industries Provides a New Source for Microproppants

    Russellville, Alabama

    MS Industries (“MSI”), is a mining and mineral development company and direct mining source located in Russellville Alabama, is a primary producer of a wide array of industrial silica products along with frac sand and silica flour for the oil and gas industries.  MSI is now offering (>99% SiO2) “Super 100” whole-grain microproppants to the oil and gas industries.  By utilizing Super 100, oil well production and lifespan increases with some recent testing and reports suggesting microproppant addition can increase oil well production up to a 15% -30% over a 12-month period.

    “In recent years, microproppant use has been shown to increase production and provide additional benefits in oil well operations”, says John Christmas, COO of MSI.  “One of the biggest obstacles was where purchasers could find a consistent and quality supplier of whole-grain microproppants, that is, until now”.

    MSI’s Super 100, carries up to 25% whole-grain microproppant with particles ranging in the -150 mesh to 325 mesh size.  Super 100 is available direct from MS Industries as are all its industrial silica products and silica flour.

    For more information please contact Brian Pace, MS Industries, 256-383-6740.

  3. API Frac Sand Standards and Microproppants

    Comments Off on API Frac Sand Standards and Microproppants
    There has been a slowly developing trend in proppants in the oil and gas markets. That trend, the size of the silica sand. The market has demanded a smaller and smaller size of silica sand as the industry has grown and evolved.
    The size of the sand used in fracking started with mesh sizes like 16-30, 20-40, 30-50 standard sieve size mesh. Eventually, 40-70 and 70-140 mesh size silica sands became the norm when propping open a well.
    At each shift to smaller sized silica, oil and gas wells increased production in both barrels per day and total life of the well.
    Does this make sense? Let me ask you another question, that might help understand this trend. Would you rather lie on the tips of three landscaping spikes or bed of thousands of nails? The same reason that a bed of thousands of nails is much preferred over the few spikes, the smaller silica sand grains work better to hold open the cracks in the shale after the fracking process. The smaller silica can distribute weight of the cracks more evenly over each grain of sand. This increases the amount of pressure the silica sand can withstand before crumbling to dust.
    The mesh sizes like 70-140 grain size silica can penetrate smaller cracks that happen during the fracking process. This increases the total open surface area of the shale for oil and gas to flow to the well head. The more surface area, the higher production of each well. Halliburton has marketed a product service known as MicroScout which has shown improvements in well production.
    Another benefit of using smaller sand is the distance the sand can be carried further away from the well head. This is known as the “Settling Velocity Rate” (“SVR”).  The larger and heavier the sand, the quicker the sand settles in slurry. The smaller sand stays in suspension and can travel further, thus leaving more surface area propped open.
    With the understanding of these ideas, the fracking world has started to develop the concept of microproppants. These are particles smaller than a 140 mesh grain. This idea makes sense, but do the normal material testing methods for frac sand work with the smallest of silica?
    There will be a series of articles that explain and breakdown each American Petroleum Institute test methods for frac sand. Then compare to see if those tests correlate to smaller grain size silica (also known as microproppants).